MEDIATIOM AS A LEGAL MECHANISM FOR INTEGTATION OF IDPS INTO COMMUNITIES

Abstract

The article highlights the role of mediation as a legal mechanism for resolving sociolegal conflicts and ensuring the effective integration of internally displaced persons into host communities under the conditions of the full-scale war in Ukraine. The essence of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution method is revealed, including its historical origins, the principles of voluntariness, confidentiality, neutrality, and equality of the parties, as well as its current legal and regulatory framework in Ukraine. The provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Mediation”, the Law of Ukraine “On Social Services”, and the practice of their implementation are analyzed, and regulatory inconsistencies between current legislation and state standards for the provision of social services in the field of conciliation and mediation are identified. It has been established that large-scale internal displacement, repeated relocations, housing difficulties, competition for jobs, limited access to social services, psychological stress, loss of social ties, and social isolation significantly increase the risks of conflicts between internally displaced persons, local residents, and public authorities. The socio-psychological aspects of the adaptation of internally displaced persons are examined, particularly the level of adaptability, readiness for social interaction, manifestations of nostalgia, alienation, and personal growth. The expediency of using traditional, online, community-based, and restorative mediation for the prompt resolution of disputes, restoration of communication between the parties, and reduction of social tension is substantiated. It is proved that mediation contributes to building trust, strengthening social cohesion, preventing conflicts, and increasing the level of legal protection of internally displaced persons. Based on the results of scientific research, statistical data, international experience, and practical cases, the article concludes that there is a need to improve the legal regulation of mediation, develop institutional infrastructure, train specialized mediators, provide financial support for pilot programs, conduct information campaigns, and implement digital tools at the level of territorial communities.